Hundreds turn
out to oppose city master plan but are city officials listening?
County Grounds Park |
“Preserve the
land first and then we can talk about development, ” stated Alderman Michael
Walsh in a Wauwatosa Community Affairs Committee meeting on April 11. It was
one of several comments that appeared to signal a shift in tone by committee
members when referring to Wauwatosa’s controversial Life Sciences District Master Plan.
The committee
was discussing a motion by alderman John Dubinski that alarmed members of the
public in attendance. He proposed that, in exchange for preserving a portion of
the “Sanctuary Woods,” the parkland would be rezoned in order to allow new
development in the existing preserve of County Grounds Park.
Dubinski
introduced his motion by saying that he considered rezoning the park for
development was the “only way to save the wooded area and wildlife habitats.”
Sacrificing County Park land was acceptable in his view because there are “no
mature trees” in the park. Many others in this debate have
emphasized saving trees. As Milwaukee
County Economic Development Director James Tarantino, who attended the meeting,
put it, “Everyone agrees the woods should be protected.”
Rendering from LSD plan depicting development adjacent to the woods. Courtesy of the City of Wauwatosa. |
The south meadow from a perspective similar to the rendering above. |
But not everyone agrees what
exactly is included in “the
woods,” let alone what constitutes protection. If city planners and
the Common Council consider destroying the open prairie to put urban,
high-density developments on existing parkland in exchange for saving a section
of woods, it indicates disregard for the significance of diverse types of
habitat and wildlife ecology. Never
mind that County Grounds Park was created as part of the compromise that
allowed for the development of the Innovation Campus. Never mind that the county
has invested considerable time and resources to restoring the park’s habitats
with native grasses, wildflowers and, yes, trees.
Never mind the
will of the people.
View of Innovation Campus showing undeveloped lots |
Only days before
the Community Affairs Committee meeting over 300 citizens attended the latest
public hearing, at which the city had unveiled its revised Life Sciences
District planning map (below). The hearing was wisely held at the Muellner
Building in order to prevent a repeat of the Open House in February when half
the crowd had to wait outside the meeting room in City Hall because it was
filled to capacity.
The will of the people was acknowledged during the April 6th
presentation. A slide reported that the “vast
majority” of written comments from the February open house included these: “Let development happen where it already is; no more development.”
Also: “No County Grounds development/Save County Grounds” and “No roads.”
Concept map showing areas to be developed in brown, all except one of which would encroach on current open space and wildlife habitat. Courtesy of the City of Wauwatosa. |
A few
moments later, however, these unequivocal sentiments were ignored when it came
to unveiling the revised plan. Not only does the map show new roads and new
development on undefined non-park county land but also the unexpected and
shocking revelation of proposed development east of Discovery Parkway in the
actual county park. The
proposed new road (which may or may not still bear the name “Scenic Parkway”)
extending east from the roundabout and turning north at 92nd Street
would require the bulldozing of critical habitats—including the
long-eared owls’ roosting site and Butler’s garter snake dens—and fragment the
parkland.
The new concept map shows buildings in the foreground of this panoramic view of County Grounds Park. |
The will of
the people, expressed during the public comment period following the
presentation, was again unequivocal, clear and virtually unanimous in its
condemnation of the proposed Life Sciences District Master Plan as revised. In
fact, although the issues of the woods, wildlife habitat, and open space were
high on the list of concerns, many of the most vocal objections targeted other
aspects of the plan. Critical comments about high-rise development, density,
congestion, and financial implications of the plan all received spirited
applause.
State Street Station under construction in the Village: Many expressed concern that Wauwatosa is overbuilding in an already saturated market. |
Many in the
crowd expressed dismay at the very notion that after 20 years of compromises,
which have whittled away more and more of the natural land, they were all back
again trying to “save the County Grounds.” Wauwatosa resident John Pokrandt
drew enormous applause and summed up the mood of the crowd when he said, "We
are not asking for two stories instead of ten; we are not asking to move the
road; we are not asking for a land swap. We are saying NO! No more compromises,
no more development on the County Grounds."
If the
Community Affairs Committee meeting was an adequate barometer it seems as if at
least some of the Wauwatosa Common Council members have been responsive to this
overwhelming public pressure. Many who were present expressed their desire to
protect “the woods.” Fortunately, the county, which is and likely will continue
to be the landowner, has weighed in recently on the vagueness of “the woods.”
In a press release dated April 6, County Executive Chris
Abele announced that the county is “surveying the site to
establish what in addition to the woods should be protected.”
Monarch butterfly with purple asters and goldenrod in County Grounds Park. |
Such a survey
and determination are long overdue. I am not alone in hoping that the county
will enlist the aid of biologists and wildlife ecologists in their effort. “If [Wauwatosa]
Mayor Ehley and County Executive Abele are sincere about their desire to
protect the “woods” and natural areas, then they should work with
environmentalists to identify those areas, create a parcel, and rezone them first,”
alderwoman Nancy Welch told me.
Bulldozing
parts of County Grounds Park shouldn’t even be considered. Neither should new
roads or any new compromises that diminish what’s left of the County Grounds. “Protecting
our natural spaces has long been a priority of mine,” said Abele in his press
release. We’ve still got a few here that need protecting. I know a lot of folks
who don’t want to be “saving the County Grounds” again in another 20 years.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sanctuary Woods. |
May 2 – A Common Council Committee of the Whole will be held, in workshop format to allow for Council discussion and interaction, with no public comment.
May 15 – A final draft master plan proposal will be submitted to the Plan Commission, with an opportunity for public comment.
May 22 – A second meeting of the Plan Commission will be held, with no public comment.
June 6 – Introduction at Common Council, set public hearing date, no public comment.
July 18 – A public hearing with public comment will be held in front of the Common Council.
Aug. 1 – A Common Council meeting will be held where final adoption of the master plan will be considered.
The dates are subject to change.
This story was first published by Milwaukee Magazine on April 25, 2017.
The county didn't listen the first time and so much of the monarch habitat was lost. There are llhabitats besides mature forests which are just as important.
ReplyDeleteOne word: Edge
ReplyDeleteAs in edge habitat. The critters thrive on it.